Modern Constitutional Law of Russia: Continuity, Innovations and Constitutional Identity
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2022-18-1-5-13
Abstract
Clarification of the trends in the formation and development of science and practice of constitutional law contributes to the concretization of its categorical and conceptual apparatus, which becomes especially relevant in connection with the amendments to the 1993 Constitution of Russia, approved by the all-Russian vote on July 1, 2020.
In the course of the research, the following was discovered: the ongoing processes of novelization of constitutional science and practice are based on some successive aspects of doctrine and practice; continuity in constitutional law is one of the forms of preserving constitutional identity, the problem of which is acute to this day, given the growing process of globalization, which erases the differences between the Basic Laws of States.
About the Author
T. I. Ryakhovskaya
Siberian Institute of Management – A Branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana I. Ryakhovskaya, Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor. SPIN 2018-8126
Novosibirsk
References
1. Chuvilkin K. V. Continuity of the constitutional development of the Russian state. Abstract of PhD Diss. Moscow, 2013, 25 p. (in Russ.)
2. Kravets I. A. The rule of law as a universal value and the diversity of constitutional identity . Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Right, 2020, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 813–851. (in Russ.)
3. Manasyan A. The idea of constitutional identity in the modern constitutional thought. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2018, no. 3, pp. 81–98.
4. Salnikov M. V. Political and legal tradition, legal culture and legal system: on the question of the relationship between categories. World of Politics and Sociology, 2012, no. 9, pp. 154–156. (in Russ.)
5. Rubanov V. G. The structure and mechanisms of social continuity. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, 2013, vol. 323, no. 6, pp. 111–117. (in Russ.)
6. Rudakova E. V. Actual aspects of legal succession in the constitutional law of Russia: Monograph. Moscow, Jurlitinform, 2013, 200 p. (in Russ.)
7. Lipen S. V. Continuity in the development of legal science as an aspect of the general problem of succession in law. Legal technology, 2011, no. 5, pp. 294–297. (in Russ.)
8. Khvostov V. M. General theory of law: Elementary sketch. 6 th ed., rev. and add. St. Petersburg, N. P. Karbasnikov, 1914, 147 p. (in Russ.)
9. Lazarevsky N. I. Lectures on Russian state law. 2 nd ed. St. Petersburg, Publ. of the joint-stock company “Slovo”, 1910, vol. 1: Constitutional rights. 480 p. (in Russ.)
10. Shershenevich G. F. General doctrine of law and state. Moscow, I. D. Sytin Publ., 1908, 159 p. (in Russ.)
11. Tomashevsky N. P. On the structure of a legal norm and the classification of its elements. In: Questions of the general theory of Soviet law: a collection of articles. Ed. by S. N. Bratus. Moscow, State Publishing House of Legal Literature, 1960, pp. 194–254. (in Russ.)
12. Korkunov N. M. Lectures on the general theory of law. 7 th ed. Moscow, N. K. Martynov Publ., 1907, 354 p. (in Russ.)
13. Vinogradov P. G. Essays on the theory of law. Moscow, A. A. Levenson Co. Press, 1915, 156 p. (in Russ.)
14. Anichkin E. S. Constitutional law of the Russian Federation and Central Asian countries in the context of universalization. In: Legal systems of Russia and Central Asian countries: problems of development and mutual influence: Collection of materials of the International scientificpractical conference dedicated to the 55 th anniversary of the law faculty of Altai State University. Eds. A. A. Vasiliev, E. S. Anichkin. Barnaul, Altai State Uni. Press, 2018, pp. 27–33. (in Russ.)
15. Ilchenko T. Yu. Constitutions of Russia: the successive aspect. Bulletin of Omsk University. Series “Right”, 2012, no. 4 (33), pp. 44–55. (in Russ.)
16. Bychkov A. V. Historical and legal characteristics of the Constitution of the USSR in 1936. History of State and Law, 2012, no. 9, pp. 18–21. (in Russ.)
17. Misrokov T. Z. Novationism and traditionalism in the constitution of the new Russia. Legal Bulletin of the DSU, 2018, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 28–31. (in Russ.)
18. Pashentsev D. A. The Constitution of the RSFSR of 1918 as a monument to the revolutionary era (to the 100 th anniversary of the first Russian Constitution). State and Law, 2018, no. 11, pp. 90–96. (in Russ.)
19. Marchenko M. N. Soviet and post-Soviet state and law (comparative legal research): a tutorial. Moscow, Prospect, 2017, 386 p. (in Russ.)
20. Markhgeim M. V. Updating the Constitution of Russia: an institutional sketch. Science and Education: Economy and Economy; entrepreneurship; law and governance, 2020, no. 7 (122), pp. 29–32. (in Russ.)
21. Monakhov G. D., Tverdokhlebova E. V. Federal territory in Russia: risks and prospects. Modern scientist, 2021, no. 2, pp. 284–289. (in Russ.)
22. Sibileva A. Yu. On the issue of the legal status of federal territories. Scientific notes of the Crimean Federal University named after V. I. Vernadsky. Legal sciences, 2020, vol. 6 (72), no. 3, pp. 49–56. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Ryakhovskaya T.I. Modern Constitutional Law of Russia: Continuity, Innovations and Constitutional Identity. Juridical science and practice. 2022;18(1):5-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2022-18-1-5-13
Views:
524
Email this article 