Special Types of Theft: Terminology and Identification Issues
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2022-18-1-71-80
Abstract
The article discusses the correlation of the general concept of “theft” with special types of theft. At present, at the doctrinal and, moreover, the normative level, the question of how to identify a “special type of theft” has not been resolved. The authors attempted to answer the question of how justified the interpretation of the definition of a special type of theft as an independent phenomenon is.
It is concluded that special types of theft deserve a separate definition.
About the Authors
R. N. Borovskikh
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Roman N. Borovskikh, Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor
Novosibirsk
O. A. Brashnina
Siberian Institute of Management – A Branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oksana A. Brashnina, Senior Lecturer
Novosibirsk
References
1. Derbok G. Z. Special types of theft and extortion: problems of criminalization and prospects for optimizing their legislative description. Abstract of Cand. of Legal Sci. Diss. Krasnodar, 2015, 28 p. (in Russ.)
2. Commentary on the Criminal Code of the RSFSR. Moscow, 1971, 350 p. (in Russ.)
3. Commentary on the Criminal Code of the RSFSR. Moscow, 1980, 210 p. (in Russ.)
4. Piontkovsky А. А., Romashkin P. S. (eds.). The course of Soviet criminal law: State crimes and crimes against Socialist property. In 6 vols. A special part, vol. 4. Moscow, 1970, 432 p. (in Russ.)
5. Vladimirov V. A. Qualification of theft of personal property. Moscow, 1974, 208 p. (in Russ.)
6. Kochoi S. M. Responsibility for mercenary crimes against property. Moscow, Lawyer, 1998, 181 p. (in Russ.)
7. Tokmantsev D. Socially dangerous consequences as a sign of the objective side of the corpus delicti provided for in Article 2282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Criminal Law, 2013, no. 3, pp. 43–47. (in Russ.)
8. Shulga A. V. Criminal-legal protection of intellectual property. Moscow, 2009, 223 p. (in Russ.)
9. Borzenkov G. N., Komissarova V. S. (eds.). Course of criminal law. In 5 vols. Moscow, 2002, vol. 3. Special part, 468 p. (in Russ.)
10. Klepitsky I. A. Real estate as a subject of theft and extortion. State and Law, 2000, no. 12, p. 12. (in Russ.)
11. Verina G. V. Differentiation of criminal liability Cases related to private property: problems of theory and practice. Saratov, 2003, 336 p. (in Russ.)
12. Boytsov A. I. Crimes against property. St. Petersburg, Legal Center Press, 2002, 773 p. (in Russ.)
13. Bezverkhov A. G. Property crimes. Samara, 2002, 359 p. (in Russ.)
14. Shulga A. V. The object and subject of crimes against property in the conditions of market relations and information society. Moscow, 2007, 365 p. (in Russ.)
15. Vishnyakova N. V. Object and subject of crimes against property. Omsk, 2008, 248 p. (in Russ.)
16. Khilyuta V. V. The criminal-legal significance of the turnover of property for the qualification of theft. Criminal Process, 2016, no. 5, pp. 52–58. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Borovskikh R.N., Brashnina O.A. Special Types of Theft: Terminology and Identification Issues. Juridical science and practice. 2022;18(1):71-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2022-18-1-71-80
Views:
371
Email this article 