Peculiarities of Qualification of Theft Committed by Officials of the Customer in the Field of Procurement
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2022-18-1-81-87
Abstract
In the structure of corruption crimes in the field of procurement to meet state and municipal needs (hereinafter referred to as the procurement sector), a significant part of the crimes naturally falls on thefts committed using one’s official position. Theft, committed in the field of procurement, can be conditionally divided into two groups: 1) theft, the executor of which is an official of the customer, and 2) theft, the executor of which is a representative of the supplier (contractor, executor). The subject of this research is theft related to the first group. The purpose of the study is to consider the specifics of qualification of embezzlement in this area, as well as to propose criteria for delimiting appropriation and embezzlement from fraud committed using one’s official position in the field of procurement.
About the Author
Sh. M. Shurpaev
St. Petersburg Law Institute (Branch) of the University of prosecutor’s office of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Shamil M. Shurpaev, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Candidate of Legal Sciences
St. Petersburg
References
1. Shurpaev Sh. M. Ugolovno-pravovaya i kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika prestupleniy korruptsionnoy napravlennosti v sfere zakupok dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd [Criminal-legal and criminological characteristics of corruption-related crimes in the field of procurement for state and municipal needs]. Cand. of Legal Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2021, 297 p. (in Russ.)
2. Sklyarov S. V., Sklyarova N. D. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za khishchenie, sovershennoe litsom s ispol'zovaniem svoego sluzhebnogo polozheniya [Criminal liability for theft committed by a person using his official position]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2013, no. 10, pp. 25–28. (in Russ.)
3. Sukhanov E. A. (ed.). Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Russian Civil Law]. Textbook. In 2 vols. Moscow, 2011, vol. 1: The general part. Property law. Inheritance law. Intellectual property rights. Personal non-property rights. (in Russ.)
4. Khilyuta V. V. Identifikatsiya priznakov moshennichestva, prisvoeniya i rastraty v sudebnoy praktike [Identification of the elements of fraud, misappropriation and embezzlement in judicial practice]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], 2015, no. 5, pp. 127–130. (in Russ.)
5. Shurpaev Sh. M. K voprosu o sushchnosti “otkatov” i “raspilov” v sisteme korruptsionnykh proyavleniy v sfere gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh zakupok [To the question of the essence of “kickbacks” and “cuts” in the system of corruption in public procurement]. Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Eurasian Law Journal], 2019, no. 8 (135), pp. 296–297. (in Russ.)
6. Karpova N. A. KHishchenie chuzhogo imushchestva: voprosy kvalifikatsii i problemy differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti [Theft of other people’s property: issues of qualification and problems of differentiation of criminal responsibility]. Moscow, 2011, 184 p. (in Russ.)
7. Lopashenko N. A. Posyagatel'stva na sobstvennost' [Encroachments on property]. Moscow, 2012, 528 p. (in Russ.)
8. Yani P. S. Moshennichestvo: moment vozniknoveniya umysla [Fraud: the time of emergence of intent]. Zakonnost' [Legality], 2017, no. 2, pp. 32–37. (in Russ.)
9. Borkov V. N. Kvalifikatsiya khishcheniy, sovershaemykh v sfere ispolneniya gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo kontrakta [Qualifications of thefts committed in the execution of state and municipal contract]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2016, no. 6, pp. 12–15. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Shurpaev Sh.M. Peculiarities of Qualification of Theft Committed by Officials of the Customer in the Field of Procurement. Juridical science and practice. 2022;18(1):81-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2022-18-1-81-87
Views:
626
Email this article 