Decodification Trends in Modern Russian Legislation
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2024-20-1-5-14
Abstract
The article uses examples from legislative practice to show that in a number of branches of Russian legislation (civil, tax, administrative-tort, etc.) decodification processes of varying degrees of intensity occur. Their manifestation is the numerous cases of the adoption of federal laws that undermine the leading, systematizing role of codes in the system of legal regulation. It is noted that in different branches of federal legislation, different forms of decodification have developed (the adoption of laws that do not comply with the codes; restriction of the operation of codes by ordinary laws; the establishment of one-time exceptions from the general codified regulatory regime; unreasonably numerous exceptions from the requirements of the general part of the code; violation of the regulatory boundary between the code and law on the introduction of the code; deviation from the principle of complete codification, etc.). Considering that decodification not only has a destructive impact on the integrity of the legislative system, but also undermines confidence in the actions of the state, it was concluded that it is necessary to develop measures to increase the stability of the code part of the legislation of the Russian Federation.
About the Author
A. A. Petrov
Baikal State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksey A. Petrov, Doctor of Law, Professor of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law
Irkutsk
References
1. Alekseev S. S. Collected works. In 10 volumes [+ Reference. volume]. Vol. 3: Problems of the theory of law: Course of lectures. Moscow, Statut publ., 2010, 781 p. (in Russ.)
2. Shebanov A. F. Regulatory acts of the Soviet state. Lectures at the Faculty of Law. Moscow, Mosc. University publ., 1956, 39 p. (in Russ.)
3. Codification of legislation: theory, practice, technology: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Nizhny Novgorod, September 25-26, 2008). V. M. Baranov, D. G. Krasnova (Eds.). Nizhniy Novgorod, Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, Torgovopromyshlennaya palata Nizhegorodskoj oblasti, 2009, 1099 p. (in Russ.)
4. Kabriyak R. Codifications. L. V. Golovko (Transl. from French). Moscow, Statut publ., 2007, 476 p. (in Russ.)
5. Basic provisions of civil law: article-by-article commentary on articles 1–16.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic edition. Revision 1.0]. Karapetov A. G. (Ed.). Moscow, M-Logos publ., 2020. 1469 p. (in Russ.)
6. Belov V. A. Civil law. In 4 vol. Vol. 1. General part. Introduction to civil law: textbook for universities. Moscow, Yurait publ., 2022, 622 p. (in Russ.)
7. Gadzhiev G. A., Pepelyaev S. G. Entrepreneur – taxpayer – state. Legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation: Textbook. Moscow, FBK-PRESS publ., 1998, 592 p. (in Russ.)
8. Vasilyeva N. V. On the issue of specific independence of tax liability. Akademicheskij yuridicheskij zhurnal, 2016, № 1, pp. 23–28. (in Russ.)
9. Sultanov A. R. Is the motivated opinion of the tax authority a non-normative act that can be challenged in court? Zhurnal administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva, 2022, № 4, pp. 13–21. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Petrov A.A. Decodification Trends in Modern Russian Legislation. Juridical science and practice. 2024;20(1):5-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2024-20-1-5-14
Views:
191
Email this article 