Dignity as the Basis of the Legal Status of the Employee
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2021-17-1-82-88
Abstract
The article concludes that the category “dignity at workplace” should become crucial for the analysis of the legal status of workers and its implementation in the labor relationship. The preservation and implementation of dignity at workplace have objective features connected with the initially “hostile” environment to dignity and the specifics of its structure. The article concludes that there is a double meaning of dignity for the legal status of employees. On the one hand, dignity as an existential value forms the basis of the legal status, and the specificity of its structure (self-respect and respect by employer; employee autonomy; self-affirmation; self-realization) is a metaphysical justification of his rights and obligations. On the other hand, as a universal moral value, dignity is the ultimate goal of the implementation of the legal status, it is a criterion for assessing labor relations.
About the Author
E. R. Voronkova
Novosibirsk State University; Siberian Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Лушникова М. В. Сущность и природа прав работника на защиту достоинства, трудовой чести и деловой репутации // Вестник Перм. ун-та. Юридические науки. 2010. № 1 (7). С. 32-38.
2. Бойко П. В. Актуальные проблемы осуществления работником права на трудовую честь и достоинство // Вестник Прикам. соц. ин-та. 2019. № 3 (84). С. 6-10.
3. Жерукова А. Б. Достоинство личности как принцип трудового права // Вестник Северо-Осетинского гос. ун-та им. К. Л. Хетагурова. 2010. № 2. С. 116-119.
4. Щербакова О. В. К вопросу о понятии психологического насилия (моббинга): социально-психологический и трудоправовой аспекты // Вестник Ом. ун-та. Серия: Право. 2018. № 4 (57). С. 118-123.
5. Харитонов М. М. Понятие сексуального домогательства (харассмента) и механизмы противодействия в трудовом праве России // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2019. № 3. С. 52-75.
6. Thomas B., Lucas K. Development and validation of the workplace dignity scale. In: Group & Organization Management. 2017. DOI 10.1177/1059601118807784. URL: https://www.academia.edu/40105747/Development_and_Validation_of_the_Workplace_Dignity_Scale
7. Савицкий Е. История и апология достоинства в современной англо-американской философии // Новое литературное обозрение. 2018. № 3 (151). С. 322-334.
8. Zuckert M. Human Dignity and the Basis of Justice: Freedom, Rights, and the Self. Hedgehog Rev., 2007, vol. 32 (45), p. 523-569. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1299176
9. Tiwari A., Sharma R. R. Dignity at the Workplace: Evolution of the Construct and Development of Workplace Dignity. Scale. Front. Psychol., 2019, no. 10, p. 2581. DOI 10.3389/ fpsyg.2019.02581
10. Маркс К. Капитал. Критика политической экономии. М.: Терра - Книжный клуб, 2009. Т. 1, кн. 1: Процесс производства капитала. 528 c.
11. Sayer A. Dignity at work: Broadening the agenda. Organization, 2007, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 565-581. DOI 10.1177/1350508407078053
12. Ильин И. А. Наши задачи. Книга первая // Ильин И. А. Собр. соч.: В 10 т. М.: Русская книга, 1993. Т. 2. 494 с.
13. Ильин И. А. О сущности правосознания // Ильин И. А. Собр. соч.: В 10 т. М.: Русская книга, 1994. Т. 4. С. 149-414.
14. Levin A. Is There a Global Approach to Workplace Privacy? (February 9, 2010) // Zureik E., Smith E., Harling Stalker L., Lyon D. (eds.). Surveillance, privacy, and the globalization of personal information: international comparisons. McGill-Queens, 2010. URL: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=988105
15. Edlund M., Lindwall L., Post I. V., Lindström U. Å. Concept determination of human dignity. Nurs. Ethics, 2013, no. 20, p. 851-860. DOI 10.1177/ 0969733013487193
Review
For citations:
Voronkova E.R. Dignity as the Basis of the Legal Status of the Employee. Juridical science and practice. 2021;17(1):82-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2021-17-1-82-88
Views:
383
Email this article 