The Obligation to Conduct Negotiations in Good Faith on the Conclusion of a Contract as an Element of the Content of a Pre-Contractual Legal Relationship
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2021-17-2-35-44
Abstract
The article discusses the issue of the content of the pre-contractual legal relationship and the role of good faith in it. As a result of the analysis, it is concluded that the content of the pre-contractual legal relationship includes only one pre-contractual obligation – to negotiate in good faith. It should be considered as a duty that includes separate elements – manifestations of the general obligation of the parties to behave in good faith, arising at the pre-contractual stage, or, in other words, requirements for good behavior. These elements include the obligation to inform; the obligation not to interrupt negotiations without giving reasons if the other party relied on the person's intention to conclude a contract; the obligation to keep the information received in confidentiality if the party knows that the information is secret and cannot be used by third parties. An attempt has been made to prove that the meaning of good faith is not in addition to the pre-contractual obligation, but in its specification.
About the Author
V. I. Boyarinova
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislava I. Boyarinova - assistant at the Department of Civil Law, SPIN 5594-8648.
Novosibirsk
References
1. Ioffe O. S., Shargorodsky M. D. Questions of the theory of law. Moscow, Gosyurizdat, 1961, 380 p. (in Russ.)
2. Shershenevich G. F. General theory of law: Textbook for the edition of 1910–1912, in 2 vol., 2nd vol. Moscow, 1995, 362 p. (in Russ.)
3. Aizenberg A. M., Kareva M. N. Legal norms and legal relations. Moscow: Moscow Bolshevik Publishing House, 1949, 59 p. (in Russ.)
4. Em V. Category of duty in Soviet civil law: Questions of theory: Cand. Jurid. Diss. Moscow, 1981, 209 p. (in Russ.)
5. Suleimenov M. K. Pre-contractual relations. Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2018, no. 4 (53), p. 50–64. (in Russ.)
6. Demkina A. V. Grounds for the pre-contractual obligation // Journal of Russian Law, 2017, no. 1, p. 109–115. (in Russ.)
7. Krasheninnikov E. A., Baigusheva Y. V. Obligations in the conduct of pre-contractual negotiations. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, 2013, no. 6, p. 82–93. (in Russ.)
8. Gnitsevich K. V. Pre-contractual liability in civil law: Cand. Jurid. Diss., SPb., 2009, 27 p. (in Russ.)
9. Budylin S. L. Assurances and guarantees. Comparative study. M.: Infotropic Media, 2017, 160 p. (in Russ.)
10. Kukleva E. A. Pre-contractual obligation to disclose information and liability for its violation: comparative legal analysis. Russian legal journal, 2016, no. 4, p. 155–161. (in Russ.)
11. Mikoni T. S. Pre-contractual obligation of the bank to disclose information when concluding an agreement with the consumer on the use of a payment card. Law, 2017, no. 4, p. 59–67. (in Russ.)
12. Pyankova A. F. Features of consumer protection in the era of digitalization of the economy / ed. O. A. Kuznetsova, V. G. Golubtsova, G. Ya. Borisevich et al. Perm Legal Almanac. Annual scientific journal, 2019, no. 1, p. 301–311. (in Russ.)
13. Bogdanov V. V. Pre-contractual legal relations in Russian civil law: Cand. Jurid. Diss. Abstract. M., 2011. 29 p. (in Russ.)
14. Gruzdev V. V. The structure of subjective civil rights and civil obligations. Actual problems of Russian law, 2018, no. 5 (90) May, p. 95–104. (in Russ.)
15. Bogdanova E.E. The conscientiousness of the participants in contractual relations and the problems of protecting their subjective civil rights: Cand. Jurid. Diss. Abstract. M., 2003. 64 p. (in Russ.)
16. Novitsky I. B. The principle of good conscience in the draft law of obligations. Bulletin of civil law, 2006, no. 1, vol. 6, p. 125–139. (in Russ.)
17. Egorov A. The principle of good faith in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation: the first steps of reform. Legal insight, 2013, no. 2, p. 4–10. (in Russ.)
18. Num K. V. Development of the principle of integrity (Treu und Glauben). Modern stage. Internal systematics. Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation, 2018, no. 7, p. 83–114. (in Russ.)
19. The main provisions of civil law: article-by-article commentary on articles 1-16.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic edition. Edition 1.0] / A. V. Asoskov, V. V. Baibak, R. S. Bevzenko et al.; ed. A. G. Karapetov. M.: M-Logos, 2020, 1471 p. (in Russ.)
20. Popova A. V. The principle of good faith in international commercial turnover: Legislation and judicial practice of the Russian Federation and the member states of the European Union: Cand. Jurid. Diss. Abstract. M., 2005, 195 p. (in Russ.)
21. Kuzmina I. D. Law enforcement value of the requirement of good faith. Vestnik NSU, Series: Right, 2014, vol. 10, iss. 1, p. 42–46. (in Russ.)
22. Shepel T. V. Is it an offense to conduct bad faith when negotiating a contract? Civil legislation. Articles. Comments. Practice, iss. 50 (ed. by Doctor of Law, Professor A. G. Didenko). Almaty, 2017. (in Russ.)
23. Kuzmina I. D. Correlation of the categories of «wine» and «bad faith» in Russian civil law. Academic legal journal, 2018, no. 4 (74), p. 28–35. (in Russ.)
24. Masadikov Sh. M. Conscientiousness in the civil legislation of Uzbekistan. In: Conscientiousness in civil law: Materials of the international. scientific-practical conf. within the framework of the annual. civilistic readings, dedicated. To the 20th anniversary of the Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan / Ed. M. K. Suleimenov. Almaty, 2014. (in Russ.)
25. Sklovsky K. I. The deal and its action. Commentary on Chapter 9 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The principle of good faith. 4th ed., Add. Moscow: Statute, 2019, 278 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Boyarinova V.I. The Obligation to Conduct Negotiations in Good Faith on the Conclusion of a Contract as an Element of the Content of a Pre-Contractual Legal Relationship. Juridical science and practice. 2021;17(2):35-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2021-17-2-35-44
Views:
488
Email this article 