The Impact of Digitalization on the Transformation of the Concept of Socio-Economic Federalism
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2022-18-2-5-10
Abstract
This study of the impact of digitalization on socio-economic federalism covers only certain aspects of this topic. In the article it is noted that digital assistants contribute to significant time savings and ease of use of services related to the sphere of state and municipal government. The possibilities of using digital technologies are leading to the fact that the hierarchical management, typical of classical bureaucracy, is collapsing, but this does not yet mean the failure of paper bureaucracy. At the same time, it is indicated that digital technologies are the tool that allows one to open the axiological gap between the real state of affairs in different regions of the Russian Federation in terms of creating conditions for the realization of socio-economic rights of the individual. The possibilities of differentiation and disproportion in the regulation of various legal relations in the subject of the Russian Federation should be focused on creating equal conditions for achieving one’s own well-being. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the substantiation of the possibility of using digital technologies, which make it possible to more quickly navigate the needs of the inhabitants of a particular region of the country and, using the electronic rule-making tool, contribute to a better law-making process in the subject of the Russian Federation in terms of the regulation of socio-economic rights. The scientific result of the study was a proposal for the gradual, soft introduction of digital technologies on existing portals to improve the well-being of citizens, taking into account their needs.
About the Author
E. V. Razdyakonova
RANEPA; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeniya V. Razdyakonova, Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Head of the Department, Docent
Siberian Institute of Management – branch
Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law
Department of theory and history of state and law, constitutional law
Novosibirsk
References
1. Chris Muellerleile and Susan L. Robertson. Digital Weberianism: Bureaucracy, Information, and the Techno-rationality of Neoliberal Capitalism // Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1 (2018), pp. 187–216. Published by: Indiana University Press. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/indjglolegstu.25.1.0187.
2. Dobrynin N. M. Constitutionalism and federalism in the domestic science of constitutional law: conjunction of concepts and meanings // Law and State: Theory and Practice. 2017. No. 4 (148). pp. 11–20. (in Russ.)
3. Stephen B. Does Federalism Make a Difference? // Publie law. l., 1999. winter. pp. 651–663.
4. Sennikova D. V. On taking into account the position of citizens in the regions when adopting federal laws: the experience of using representative and direct form s of democracy // Legal Science and Practice. 2020. Vol. 16. No. 3. Pp. 20–27. (in Russ.)
5. Lundstedt A . V. Legal Thinking Revised: My Views on Law. Stockholm, 1956. P. 140
6. Razdyakonova E. V. To the question of the signs of socio-economic constitutionalism // Legal Science and Practice. 2020. V. 16. No. 2. S. 33-40. (in Russ.)
7. The right of the digital environment: monograph / under. ed. T. P. Podshivalova, E. V. Titova, E. A. Gromova. – Moscow: Prospekt, 2022, 896 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Razdyakonova E.V. The Impact of Digitalization on the Transformation of the Concept of Socio-Economic Federalism. Juridical science and practice. 2022;18(2):5-10. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2022-18-2-5-10
Views:
320
Email this article 