Theoretical and Legal Essence of Intellectual Property Objects
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2023-19-2-46-54
Abstract
The article examines groups of intellectual property objects, their characteristic features, methods of protection, in order to determine their legal essence and compliance with the current legislative regulation. The methodology of studying the problems of legal support of intellectual property objects is based on positivist (intellectual rights, their scope and content are determined by the state) and socio-anthropological (the results of intellectual activity are formed based on human needs, aimed at satisfying them) approaches. Various types of objects have been identified, based on the criteria of origin, commercial value for economic turnover, legal protection, such as: a) objects related to the substantive essence; b) objects with a priority value of the form; c) objects related to copyright; d) objects for the identification of a legal entity, goods, works or services of enterprises; e) the results of intellectual activity involved in economic turnover, separated by a secret from an indefinite circle of participants.
About the Author
I. V. Shirkova
Tugan-Baranovsky Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina V. Shirkova, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Legal and Political Sciences
Donetsk
References
1. Buzova N. V. Restrictions of copyright and related rights: problems of citation // Journal of the Court of Intellectual Rights, 2019. No. 23. Pp. 46‒55.
2. Gavrilov E. P. Commentary to the Law on Copyright and Related Rights (article by article); 4th ed., reprint. and add. Moscow.: Exam, 2005. 384 p.
3. Gavrilov E. P. Legal protection of production secrets in Russia: critical analysis // Economic law. 2018. No. 8(499). Pp. 3–20.
4. Dozortsev V. A. Intellectual rights: Concept; System; Codification tasks. Moscow: Statute, 2003. 416 p.
5. Eremenko V. I. Legislation of the Russian Federation on trade secrets // Intellectual Property Exchange. 2004. No. 11. Pp. 3‒10.
6. Eremenko V. I. Brand names and commercial designations: myths and reality // Legislation and Economics. M.: Legislation and Economics. 2015. No. 11. Pp. 7‒15.
7. Kalacheva T. L. Industrial design as an object of legal protection // Intellectual property in the innovative development of the region: materials region. sci.- practice. conf., Khabarovsk, 29 Apr. 2016. Khabarovsk: Publishing House of the Pacific State University, 2016. Pp. 67‒71.
8. Kalina I. I. Typologization of intellectual property objects // Bulletin of the Saratov State Socio-Economic University. 2011. No. 1(5). Pp. 17‒21.
9. Matveev A. G. Arguments justifying the protection of related rights: from the argument of justice to the idea of public benefit // Law and Modern Economics: New challenges and prospects: A collection of materials of the II scientific and practical conference with international participation of the Faculty of Law of St. Petersburg State University. 2019. Pp. 237‒243.
10. Maggs P. B., Sergeev A. P. Intellectual property. Moscow: Lawyer, 2000. 400 p.
11. Churilov A. Yu. Problems of protection of computer programs // Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2020. № 1(132). Pp. 94‒101.
12. Shirkova I. V. Protection of copyright objects: a legal aspect // Collection of scientific works of the series “Law”. 2021. No. 3(23). Pp. 96‒106.
13.
Review
For citations:
Shirkova I.V. Theoretical and Legal Essence of Intellectual Property Objects. Juridical science and practice. 2023;19(2):46-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2023-19-2-46-54
Views:
196
Email this article 