THE REASONS FOR THE CREATION OF THE PAETORSIP IN ANCIENT ROME: HISTORIOGRAPHICAL CONSTRUCTS
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2017-14-1-5-11
Abstract
Praetorship occupied important place in Roman civitas and had a significant influence on the development of public and private law of Rome. One of the most controversial issues in the study of the praetorship remains the question of the reasons for the introduction of this magistracy in the state system of Ancient Rome. The article presents the scientific outlooks on the reasons for the creation of the magistracy of the praetor. During our research two main trends in science were identified and analyzed. The first believes that the establishment of the praetorship is one of the stages of the class struggle, as "compensation" to the patricians, which allowed the plebeians to gain access to the consulate. The second direction is presented by the authors, highlighting as the main reason for the creation of the praetor the growth of the official duties of the Roman magistrates in the judicial, military or administrative spheres. We used special-historical and special-juridical methods.
Keywords
praetor,
state,
Ancient Rome,
classical studies,
ius publicum,
republic,
magistrates,
historiography
About the Author
O. A. Vlasova
Moscow University of Finance and Law (Yaroslavl branch )
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Моммзен Т. История Рима: В 3 т. Ростов н/Д., 1997. Т. 1.
2. Блох А. Сословная и социальная история Римской Республики. СПб., 1904.
3. Sanctis de G. Storia dei Romani. La Conquista del primato in Italia I1. Firenze, 1966.
4. Martino de F. Storia della Constituzione Romana. Napoli, 1958.
5. Lubtow von U. Das Romische Volk: Sein Staat und Recht. Frankfurt a. M., 1955.
6. Нетушил И. В. Лекции по римской истории. Харьков, 1909. Т. 1.
7. Герье В. И. История римского народа. М., 2002.
8. Ковалев С. И. История Рима: Курс лекций. Л., 1986.
9. Немировский А. И. История раннего Рима и Италии. Возникновение классового общества и государства. Воронеж, 1962.
10. Нечай Ф. М. Образование Римского государства. Минск, 1972.
11. Азаревич Д. Патриции и плебеи в Риме. СПб., 1875. Т. 1.
12. Покровский И. А. История римского права. СПб., 1998.
13. Хвостов М. М. История Рима. Казань, 1907.
14. Capogrossi Colognesi L. Diritto e potere nella storia di Roma. Napoli, 2007.
15. Кофанов Л. Л. Генезис преторского права в Риме IV в. до н. э. // Forum Romanum: Докл. III Междунар. конф. «Римское частное и публичное право: многовековой опыт развития европейского права». Ярославль; Москва, 2003. С. 10-15.
16. Coli U. Scritti di diritto romano. Milano, 1973. Vol. 2.
17. Mitchell R. E. Patricians and plebeians: The Origin of the Roman State. Ithaca, NY, 1990.
18. Brennan C. The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. Oxford, 2000.
19. Коптев А. В. Сведения Тита Ливия о развитии консулата в IV в. до н. э. // Мнемон. 2015. № 15. С. 291-321.
20. Кофанов Л. Л. Характер преторского эдикта в Риме IV-III вв. до н. э. // Ius Antiquum. 2004. № 2 (14). С. 60-68.
21. Broughton T. R. S. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Atlanta, 1951. Vol. 1.
22. Abbot F. F. A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Boston; London, 1901. Pt 2.
23. Taylor Th. M. A constitutional and political history of Rome from the earliest times to the reign of Domitian. London, 1899.
24. Raaflaub K. A. Between Myth and History: Rome’s Rise from Village to Empire (the Eighth Century to 264) // A companion to the Roman Republic / Ed. by Nathan Rosenstein and Robert Morstein-Marx. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006. P. 125-147.
25. Cornell T. J. The beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (1000-264 BC). London, New-York: Routledge, 1995. 507 p.
26. Васильев А. В. Магистратская власть в Риме в республиканскую эпоху: традиции и инновации: Дис. … канд. ист. наук. СПб., 2014.
27. Белкин М. В. Римский сенат в эпоху сословной борьбы VI-IV вв. до н. э. URL: http://centant.spbu.ru/aristeas/monogr/belkin/belk011.htm (дата обращения 12.02.2018).
Review
For citations:
Vlasova O.A. THE REASONS FOR THE CREATION OF THE PAETORSIP IN ANCIENT ROME: HISTORIOGRAPHICAL CONSTRUCTS. Juridical science and practice. 2018;14(1):5-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2017-14-1-5-11
Views:
909
Email this article 