Problems of Admissibility of Legal Opinions Specialist in Criminal Justice
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2024-20-3-68-75
Abstract
In this article, the author considers the most common arguments against recognizing the admissibility of using legal knowledge as special in the framework of criminal proceedings. Arguments are given in favor of such special studies. It is concluded that there are objective prerequisites in the current legislation for recognizing the viability of legal expertise and special research.
About the Author
A. D. Leontiev
Kuban State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastas D. Leontiev, 2nd year post-graduate student of the Faculty of Law. Named after A. Khmyrov
Krasnodar
References
1. Leontiev A. D. Criteria of special knowledge in criminal proceedings. Law and law, 2023, no. 3, pp. 195–197. DOI 10.56539/20733313_2023_3_195. (in Russ.)
2. Votkin V. A. The value of special knowledge for the disclosure and investigation of robbery attacks in the North Caucasus Federal District. Russian investigator, 2018, no. 1, pp. 60–62. (in Russ.)
3. Rossinskaya E. R. The concept of forensic regulatory examinations as a basis for the use of special legal knowledge in forensic activities. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University N. I. Lobachevsky, 2015, no. 2, pp. 149–152. (in Russ.)
4. Stepanov V. V., Shapiro L. G. Special knowledge in forensic expertise. Forensic expertise, 2004, no. 1, pp. 66–69. (in Russ.)
5. Tarasov A. A. Expert and specialist in the criminal process of Russia: monograph. 2nd ed., revised. and additional Moscow, Prospekt publ., 2022, 125 p. (in Russ.)
6. Statkus V. F. About legal expertise and “second-class” lawyers. Russian justice, 2006, no. 1, pp. 47–50. (in Russ.)
7. Sviridov D. A. To the question of the essence of special knowledge in the investigation of crimes. Uchenye zapiski Taurida National University named after V. I. Vernadsky. Series: Legal Sciences, 2013, vol. 26, no. 1 (65), pp. 332–337. (in Russ.)
8. Sokolov A. F., Remizov M. V. The use of special knowledge in criminal proceedings: a textbook; Yaroslavl State university named after P. G. Demidov. Yaroslavl, 2010, 131 p. (in Russ.)
9. Lazareva V. A. Evidence in criminal proceedings. Moscow, 2013, 343 p. (in Russ.)
10. Zaeva O. P. Special knowledge as part of the system of means of proof. Society and Law, 2021, no. 3(77), pp. 60–67. (in Russ.)
11. Zinin A. M. Participation of a specialist in legal proceedings: Textbook. Moscow, Prospekt publ, 2011, 254 p. (in Russ.)
12. Telegina T. D. To the question of the modern understanding of special knowledge in the criminal process of Russia. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 11: Law, 2008, no. 2, pp. 85–98. (in Russ.)
13. Obukhova S. S. The use of special knowledge in criminal proceedings. Intellect. Innovation. Investments, 2010, no. 4, pp. 155–158. (in Russ.)
14. Trapeznikova I. I. Special knowledge in the criminal process of Russia (concept, signs, structure): author. dis. … cand. legal Sciences. Chelyabinsk, 2004, 22 p. (in Russ.)
15. Pozdnyakov M. A. The use of special knowledge in the investigation of illegal extraction of aquatic biological resources using foreign ships: author. dis. ... cand. legal Sciences. Krasnodar, 2019, 30 p. (in Russ.)
16. Orlov Yu. K. Modern problems of proving and using special knowledge in criminal proceedings: a scientific and educational guide. Moscow, Prospekt publ., 2021, 217 p. (in Russ.)
17. Lazareva L. V. Conceptual bases for the use of special knowledge in the Russian criminal process: dis. … PhD. Moscow, 2011, 470 p. (in Russ.)
18. Kudryavtseva A., Livshits Yu. Evidentiary value of “legal” examinations in the criminal process. Wise lawyer. URL: https://clck.ru/338NmM (date of access: 08/21/2023). (in Russ.)
19. Rossinskaya E. R. Special knowledge and modern problems of their use in legal proceedings. Journal of Russian Law, 2010, no. 9, pp. 32–43. (in Russ.)
20. Averyanova T. V. Forensic examination. General theory course. Moscow, 2006, 479 p. (in Russ.)
21. Rossinskaya E. R. Theoretical and applied problems of forensic science // Proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference “Theory and practice of forensic science in modern conditions.” Moscow, February 14–15, 2007. Moscow, TK Welby, Prospekt Publ. House, 2007, pp. 3–11. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Leontiev A.D. Problems of Admissibility of Legal Opinions Specialist in Criminal Justice. Juridical science and practice. 2024;20(3):68-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2024-20-3-68-75
Views:
90
Email this article 