LEGAL PROBLEMS OF INVALIDATION OF DECISIONS OF THE MEETING

Abstract

The article presents the legal implication of invalidation of decisions of the meetings of various civil communities, and analyzes judicial practice. It is substantiated that the invalidity of the decisions of the meeting does not automatically invalidate all actions committed on its basis. It is recognized as necessary in determining the validity of subsequent legal facts to be guided by the principles of public reliability of state registers, as well as the principles of good faith and stability of civil circulation. Based on the study of judicial practice it is established that the implication of invalidation of decisions of the meetings can be effective for third parties only from the moment they learned or should have learned about the invalidity of the decision. It seems that such a moment can be the entry into legal force of judgment on invalidation of decisions of the meetings.