The State’s Anti-Terrorist Function and Human Rights Activities: Understanding Problems and Searching for New Solutions

Abstract

From the socially established moral behavior depends on the fruitfulness of prevention, which, by its volume is much higher than phase detect and prevent terrorist acts, but the question arises in respect of legal support in this sphere, since such software often do not completely correspond to the legal positions of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, which has repeatedly noted that in the standard interpretation of any authority, the legal norm must meet the requirement of certainty, clarity and unambiguity (resolutions of 25 April 1995 no. 3-P, of 15 July 1999 no. 11-P, of 25 February 2004 no. 4-P, of 20 April 2009 no. 7-P, of 6 December 2011 no. 27-P, of 29 June 2012 no. 16-P, of 22 April 2013 no. 8-P, of 18 November 2014 no. 30-P). The principle of legal certainty implies a systematic and comprehensive legal regulation of public relations, clarity, accuracy, consistency and logical consistency of the rules of laws that ensure their uniform application in practice. These approaches were confirmed in the decision of the court of the Eurasian economic Union dated February 21 2017 NO-1-1/1-16-BK. Artificially delaying the resolution and coordination of common positions on human rights and freedoms requires the formation of a coordinated approach on the part of an adequate anti-terrorist unit in order to prevent sustainable development. The perception of this development by the subjects of state management and control in the field of counter-terrorism as an important element in the system of this function will improve the implementation of a comprehensive anti-terrorist approach. The article considers these trends, prospects and draws conclusions.