Preview

Juridical science and practice

Advanced search

Оn the Issue of Providing a Citizen a Land Plot in Public Property without Bidding for Haymaking or Grazing of Farm Animals

https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2022-18-3-33-42

Abstract

Based on the analysis of paragraphs 19 of part 2 of art. 39.6 of the Land Code of the Russian Federation and law enforcement practice, it is concluded that the current version of this rule of law does not provide citizens with a real opportunity to lease publicly owned land plots without bidding for the purposes of haymaking or grazing farm animals for personal needs due to an unjustifiably restrictive interpretation in law enforcement practice of the possible size of the area such sites and the lack of a uniform understanding of the purposes of providing these sites, related to the definition of personal or business needs, which carries a significant risk for already concluded lease agreements to be invalidated. The importance of the allocation of a separate basis in Part 2 of Article 39.6 of the Land Code of the Russian Federation – the provision of a land plot to a citizen for haymaking, grazing of farm animals, as well as the establishment in the legislation of the subjects of the Russian Federation of the maximum size of the area of land plots provided to citizens specifically for haymaking or grazing of farm animals is substantiated; it is concluded that it is necessary to amend the List of documents confirming the applicant’s right to purchase a land plot without bidding, in terms of the obligation to request information about the presence or absence of a citizen of entrepreneurial status.

About the Author

V. A. Sukalo
Katanov Khakass State University
Russian Federation

Vitalii A. Sukalo, post-graduate student

Abakan

 



References

1. Goncharova V. A. Problems of legal qualification of the bargains, contradicting to the law and combating the public interestsand interests of third parties, and its consequences. Juridical Science and Practice, 2020, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 50–56. (in Russ.)

2. Karapetov A. G., Tuzov D. O. Transactions concluded in contradiction with peremptory norms of the law, in the context of the new version of Art. 168 of the Civil Code. Civil Law Bulletin, 2016, no. 5, pp. 14–67. (in Russ.)

3. Kiyashko G. A., Derevyankina A. P. The granting of land plots for which state ownership is not delimited in the territory of the municipality. Environmental management and environmental management of geolandscapes, 2021, no. 1, pp. 26–31. (in Russ.)

4. Menis E. V. Legal features of the contract of lease of land plots of agricultural destination. Eurasian Law Journal, 2017, no. 9, pp. 153–155. (in Russ.)

5. Titov N. D. Analysis of judicial practice in cases involving contesting transactions in connection with their contradiction to the essense of legislative regulation of the corresponding type of obligations. Law and Politics, 2019, no. 9, pp. 16–28. (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Sukalo V.A. Оn the Issue of Providing a Citizen a Land Plot in Public Property without Bidding for Haymaking or Grazing of Farm Animals. Juridical science and practice. 2022;18(3):33-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2022-18-3-33-42

Views: 271


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0410 (Print)