Independent Expertise Organized by the Ombudsman for the Rights of Consumers of Financial Services: Procedural Problems and Place in the System of Evidence in Civil Proceedings
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2023-19-2-64-74
Abstract
The present research deals with the procedural problems connected with the independent expertise, organized by the Financial services consumer rights ombudsman, the conclusion about the significant differences of this expertise from the judicial expertise, the conclusion that the expertise organized by the Financial services consumer rights ombudsman in the judicial process refers to the written evidence, and at the same time leads to an increased standard of justification for the appointment of judicial expertise. Within the framework of the article the author proposed measures aimed at detailed regulation of the process of independent expertise, organized by the ombudsman for the rights of consumers of financial services, which would increase the level of objectivity and protection of the rights of consumers of financial services.
About the Author
A. A. Ryabkov
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Ryabkov, postgraduate student, leading legal adviser at the Siberian Main Department of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
References
1. Molodyko K. Russian Compulsory Financial Ombudsman And Civil Procedure [Online] // Russian Law Journal. 2021. No. 3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/russian-compulsory-financial-ombudsman-and-civil-procedure (accessed on: 22.05.2023);
2. Voronin S. A. Judicial and Extrajudicial Expertise // Problems of Economics and Legal Practice. 2016. No. 2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sudebnye-i-vnesudebnye-ekspertizy (acces- sed on: 04.06.2023).
3. Civil process / Ed. K. S. Yudelson. Moscow : Jurid. lit., 1972. 439 p.
4. Civil Procedure: Textbook (5th edition, revised and supplemented) [Online] / Ed. M. K. Treushnikov. M.: Statut, 2014 URL: https://www.consultant.ru/edu/student/download_books/book/treushnikov_mk_grazhdanskij_process_uchebnik/?ysclid=lihfve92mk78715428 (accessed on: 29.05.2023).
5. Zabolotskaya I. V. Expertise in arbitration process [Online] // «Arbitration and Civil Process».2011.No. 9 URL: https://online11.consultant.ru/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&ts=5f0NJgTCI2QqpBjN1&cacheid=9AAAC11C9C63CB6B73D37BEC9DAE1E72&mode=splus&rnd=tyHPOQ&base=CJI&n=57379#AL1NJgTeyFTDWXkn (accessed on: 03.06.2023).
6. Egorova O. A. To a question on «necessary» evidences at consideration of claims for recovery of insurance compensation under contracts of motor insurance [Online] // Juridical researches. 2020. No. 3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-neobhodimyh-dokazatelstvah-pri-rassmotrenii-trebovaniy-o-vzyskanii-strahovogo-vozmescheniya-po-dogovoram-avtostrahovaniya (accessed on: 16.05.2023).
7. Klimov V. V. Legal nature of the institute of financial commissioner in the Russian Federation [Online] // Actual problems of Russian law. 2023. No. 4(149). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovaya-priroda-instituta-finansovogo-upolnomochennogo-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii (accessed on: 15.05.2023).
8. Kurylev S. V. Bases of the theory of proof in the Soviet justice. - Minsk: Publishing House of the Belarusian State University, 1969. – 203 с.
9. Mokhov A. A. Specificity of the expert conclusion as judicial proof [Online] // “Arbitration and Civil Process”. 2003. No. 9 Access from the «ConsultantPlus» URL: https://online11.consultant.ru/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&ts=5f0NJgTCI2QqpBjN1&cacheid=14AE5E22C47348A7B2619EBE2A06E100&mode=splus&rnd=tyHPOQ&base=CJI&n=5051#8k6NJgT0EJb7PbWn1 (access date: 03.06.2023).
10. Chelysheva O. V. Appointment and production of forensic examinations: a training manual. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Legal Institute (branch) of the Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation, 2010. 71 p.
11. Naumov M. A. Some problems of application of the law on the financial commissioner in the process of protection of civil rights [Online] // Civilist. 2023. No. 1. Access from the «ConsultantPlus» URL: https://online11.consultant.ru/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&ts=q4E10fTgXHzGLhSE2&cacheid=3E575BB61BAE411ADAB86D46CA4059D9&mode=splus&rnd=tfqIEQ&base=CJI&n=146980#LGL10fTbgUZHWRBV (accessed on: 14.05.2023).
12. Rikhterman V. Y., Rodionov V. I. Evidentiary value of forensic expertise in arbitration proceedings. Legal aspects of evaluation of the expert’s conclusion and the possibility of its critical perception [Online] // “Law”. 2019. No. 10. URL: https://online11.consultant.ru/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&ts=ivdiJgTAYC2dK8RC1&cacheid=697438781977B5D838D6C9DCACD994EF&mode=splus&rnd=8f31Qw&base=CJI&n=126966#HZriJgTTLEQu7nK6 (accessed on: 04.06.2023).
13. Rozhdestvenskaya T. E., Guznov A. G. Peculiarities of the legal status of the financial commissioner [Online] // Bulletin of Kutafin University. 2018. No. 10(50). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-pravovogo-statusa-finansovogo-upolnomochennogo (accessed on: 22.05.2023).
14. Three years on protection of the rights of consumers [Online] // Bulletin of the Financial Ombudsman Service. 2022. No. 3(06). URL: https://finombudsman.ru/assets/templates/sodfu/img/news/247/FIN_FV-03-2022.pdf (accessed on: 17.05.2023).
15. Vladimirov L. E. Doctrine of criminal evidence : parts: general and peculiar. 3rd edition, revised and finished. St. Petersburg: book magazine. Legislation, 1910. XXXVIII, [2], 400 p.
16. Yudin I. V. To a question about the concept of forensic expertise in civil proceedings [Online] // Scientific Notes of the Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical Sciences. 2020. No. 4. URL:https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-ponyatii-sudebnoy-ekspertizy-vgrazhdans-kom-sudoproizvodstve (accessed on: 04.06.2023).
17.
Review
For citations:
Ryabkov A.A. Independent Expertise Organized by the Ombudsman for the Rights of Consumers of Financial Services: Procedural Problems and Place in the System of Evidence in Civil Proceedings. Juridical science and practice. 2023;19(2):64-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2023-19-2-64-74
Views:
173
Email this article 